BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 3 个月前Lets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1142arrow-down11 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageLets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldBeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 3 个月前message-square18fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKeeponstalin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·3 个月前This is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-23 个月前No. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran. The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 个月前 in both Venezuela For kidnapping that bus driver? determining targets in Iran. You mean murdering school girls? Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 个月前To be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift. Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.
deleted by creator
This is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
No. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran.
The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
For kidnapping that bus driver?
You mean murdering school girls?
Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
To be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift.
Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.