I am not in the wrong. Removing posts based on mod opinion is an abuse of power. There is no rule that this post violates. You are just power tripping.
I don’t see anything in the post that suggests it is sponsored. The authors name is clearly listed at the bottom as a writer for Parade who covers certain topics. Just because news happens that involves certain brands doesn’t mean it’s an advertisement.
I am not in the wrong. Removing posts based on mod opinion is an abuse of power. There is no rule that this post violates. You are just power tripping.
You say I’m wrong, but never have a good reason.
It’s not opinion. It’s a fluff piece on how someone made money for their employer.
It’s advertising. For tick-tock or however your spell it, and for Staples, as well as for the content creator.
Either you are willfully ignorant, or your directly tied to this piece.
Calling what I’m saying an opinion is misinformation.
I don’t see anything in the post that suggests it is sponsored. The authors name is clearly listed at the bottom as a writer for Parade who covers certain topics. Just because news happens that involves certain brands doesn’t mean it’s an advertisement.
South Park did an entire episode about recognizing ads that don’t look like ads. Highly recommend it!
Explain to me why other major news publications are covering the same story then
Removed by mod