March 1, 2026

  • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    Is it really a failed state when most of its problems have been caused by a major outside aggressive influence? Wouldn’t a failed state be when it has failed internally without sanctions or embargoes thanks to a certain global bully to its north.

  • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not a failed state, if it had failed it would be a failed country. It’s clear that if it’s failing it’s because of external influences, but regardless, don’t reduce it’s sovereignty into a “state”, it’s a proper country.

  • StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    First and foremost, besieged nation. Like The Soviet Union, besieged by corruption. The Middle East, besieged by greed for oil money. Saddest the former beacon, the United States of America, by religious dogmas. None of any examples you could mention will be different. They’re all driven by people of similar character, made by their genes and life experiences. How can we change our evolution and society to reduce the impact of these negative influences.