I’m in a safe Dem area. I voted Harris and know people who didn’t because of Gaza. Their votes didn’t really matter because of where they lived. If the race was going to be close in their areas they would have voted. It sure is interesting how people understand the concept of strategic voting when it benefits their perspective. Withholding votes in safe districts to signal disapproval with the candidate or party is one of the most basic milquetoast things someone can do.

All of this hubbub and they didn’t even affect the election outcome per basically every article that has come out since. Had she fully endorsed a more populist approach I’m sure she would’ve beat the couch for enough people to tip her over the edge, but instead her campaign kept pretending like everyone wanted a right leaning centrist incapable of any stance not endorsed by their handlers. Americans writ large don’t care enough about Americans to do anything substantial, they certainly don’t care about Gaza more than voting for a candidate they thought would materially improve their lives. I’ve been trying to explain for over a year and people just don’t like that answer. Admittedly, I too would prefer to live in a world where the issue is that too many people cared about a genocide and not that America just happens to be full of stupid fascistic bigots.