• WanderWisley@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think one of my favorite theories about all of this is that Ghislaine and Jeff were in contact with Christopher Poole (creator of 4chan) and they were the original founders of QAnon, and they helped start the Pizza gate and all of that crazy nonsense, but slipped in a little bit of reality with the child trafficking and rape, so that in the future, when or if it was discovered people would only grasp onto the most extreme made up shit and not take too much notice about the human trafficking, and the theory I have is that the Epstein files is just exposing elite powerful people that partook in raping and human trafficking people for blackmail and nothing else. I don’t think there was anything greater other than that with the way they would talk in emails. I don’t think they were smart enough to worship some great dark Satan devil or whatever else is said online about it.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are strong correlation between /pol and Epstein. And it’s long been fascist/authoritarian to accuse outgroups of the crimes you commit so that if and when your crimes are revealed. It’s easier for campist to dismiss them as “when our side does it, the victims deserved it actually”.

      I would have a harder time believing Epstein and Q had no connection. That’s way way to many specific coincidences.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      some great dark Satan devil or whatever else

      No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

      Matthew 6:24

      Potayto, potahto.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          One could probably do linguistic archeology on the exact meanings of the words “serve” and “master” in the original language the quote would have been written in. I’m curious if the exact words would be cross-applicable with one’s parents. But in a larger sense, no, I don’t personally think that one serves one’s parents. One is raised by one’s parents, and may even be expected to be obedient to them, but to “serve” as one serves a master isn’t to my mind an appropriate way to think of one’s relationship with one’s parents.