I have won this argument for a 2nd time because you have no other response besides “no u”
In the meantime, us vegans will keep convincing people successfully that…
Honestly, this reads as you trying to reconvince yourself. Just repeat the mantra to yourself, and the cognitive dissonance that I brought to light will go away?
any animal can be raped
True
cows who are artificially inseminated
Is not rape and you already admitted it is not equivalent to rape. Consider if you would look an actual rape victim in the face and talk to them about artificial insemination of cows as if it were rape and comparable to the real suffering they went through. I bet you wouldn’t.
You keep trying to catch me in a trap as if I fell into one. You’re hallucinating.
Real suffering
Shows your speciesist bias. How fortunate that you ignore to acknowledge that bias in order to buff up your argument and make it appear stronger than it is.
Artificial insemination is rape, and cows suffer as a result, just as women do, dogs do, and any other species.
And for the record, you don’t care about women getting raped. You literally don’t give a fuck because if you did, you’d understand the parallels between what humans can experience and what non-human animals can experience. Rape to any animal is a violation that can fuck them up, psychologically!
But your sick, egotistical, selfish world view blocks you from giving a shit. I suspect this world view also extends to other beliefs of yours.
Go crawl back into the hole where you feel morally righteous. Meanwhile, is vegans will continue to fight for animal rights which includes anti-artificial insemination and freedom.
I’m questioning your support for psychopathic opinions. Because it is psychopathic to think of animals as lesser beings compared to humans that deserve less dignity, respect, and moral consideration.
That is what both you and theunknownmuncher are defending. Disgusting.
No, I never make personal attacks or ad hominem. The fact that you’ve stooped to this level shows that your argument has failed and you cannot use logic or reasoning to back it up.
What does it say that you’ve downvoted the message “Personal attacks are not welcome here”. I think everyone should support that message.
Theunknownmuncher said that I trivialize the experience of human rape victims. I never said anything that would trivialize their experiences. I advocated for broadening the scope of what we call rape to more than just humans. It’s anthropocentric to think that only humans can be raped.
Does this sub encourage bad faith discussions? That seems to be against the principle of civility.
I have won this argument for a 2nd time because you have no other response besides “no u”
Honestly, this reads as you trying to reconvince yourself. Just repeat the mantra to yourself, and the cognitive dissonance that I brought to light will go away?
True
Is not rape and you already admitted it is not equivalent to rape. Consider if you would look an actual rape victim in the face and talk to them about artificial insemination of cows as if it were rape and comparable to the real suffering they went through. I bet you wouldn’t.
You keep trying to catch me in a trap as if I fell into one. You’re hallucinating.
Shows your speciesist bias. How fortunate that you ignore to acknowledge that bias in order to buff up your argument and make it appear stronger than it is.
Artificial insemination is rape, and cows suffer as a result, just as women do, dogs do, and any other species.
And for the record, you don’t care about women getting raped. You literally don’t give a fuck because if you did, you’d understand the parallels between what humans can experience and what non-human animals can experience. Rape to any animal is a violation that can fuck them up, psychologically!
But your sick, egotistical, selfish world view blocks you from giving a shit. I suspect this world view also extends to other beliefs of yours.
Go crawl back into the hole where you feel morally righteous. Meanwhile, is vegans will continue to fight for animal rights which includes anti-artificial insemination and freedom.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
Interesting to hear this perspective when theunknownmuncher has been doing the same throughout my thread with them and this entire post.
the other user hasn’t said anything that rises to the level of these statements from you.
try to be civil.
Meet psychopathy with civility? Interesting response.
you’re just doubling down. try some selfcrit
I’m questioning your support for psychopathic opinions. Because it is psychopathic to think of animals as lesser beings compared to humans that deserve less dignity, respect, and moral consideration.
That is what both you and theunknownmuncher are defending. Disgusting.
i haven’t supported any opinions at all.
I haven’t said they’re lesser. I don’t think they did either, but it’s possible I missed it.
No, I never make personal attacks or ad hominem. The fact that you’ve stooped to this level shows that your argument has failed and you cannot use logic or reasoning to back it up.
What does it say that you’ve downvoted the message “Personal attacks are not welcome here”. I think everyone should support that message.
You made a personal attack when you put words in my mouth and forced me to take a position I never held.
I’m defending myself accordingly.
no, they didn’t.
Theunknownmuncher said that I trivialize the experience of human rape victims. I never said anything that would trivialize their experiences. I advocated for broadening the scope of what we call rape to more than just humans. It’s anthropocentric to think that only humans can be raped.
Does this sub encourage bad faith discussions? That seems to be against the principle of civility.
i think it’s reasonable to say that when you compare a veterinary procedure to rape.
I’ve never contested this. We agree on this point. Continuing to argue it is a strawman.