Why YSK:

Despite choking being an emergency, until recently there has been limited high-quality evidence to guide bystanders on the most effective way to help. Techniques like abdominal thrusts (formerly known as the Heimlich maneuver), back blows and chest compressions or thrusts have existed since the mid-1900s but, until recently, recommendations were largely based on case reports rather than rigorous scientific data. This evidence gap is dangerous.

Bystander response is the primary driver of a choking person’s outcome, so ensuring people know the safest and most effective way to care for a choking person can save lives.

Please see the article for the full piece, it’s not long.

Article authors:

  • Cody Dunne - Emergency Medicine Physician and PhD Candidate, University of Calgary
  • Andrew McRae - Associate Professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary
  • Khara Sauro - Associate professor, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary

If you need more motivation to open the article, here is an interesting fact:

New research suggests back blows cleared choking obstructions in 72 per cent of cases, superior to both abdominal thrusts (59 per cent) and chest thrusts (27 per cent).

  • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I remember health class around 1993 we were watching a filmstrip from the 70s or early 80s, and the filmstrip told us to do the back blows before performing the Heimlich maneuver. Our health teacher then paused the video and told us NOT to do the back blows, because new research had found that back blows are more likely to push the obstruction further inwards.

    I’m glad they had it right in the filmstrip!