Your political advocacy clearly suggests otherwise. Usually if you value all human life equally, you would not advocate for a candidate promising “the most lethal military in the world” in combination with pledging “no change” from Biden’s policies of contribution to an internationally-recognized genocide, with the rationale of “it may make those closest to me slightly safer”.
Your espoused values are in conflict with each other. Cognitive dissonance. Sort that out.
You don’t need to, I already agree with you on that point.
Your political advocacy clearly suggests otherwise. Usually if you value all human life equally, you would not advocate for a candidate promising “the most lethal military in the world” in combination with pledging “no change” from Biden’s policies of contribution to an internationally-recognized genocide, with the rationale of “it may make those closest to me slightly safer”.
Your espoused values are in conflict with each other. Cognitive dissonance. Sort that out.
Cool, you have no interest in understanding me. Have a good one.