• scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you paid the tarrif directly to the government then you have a chance for a refund. If you paid for higher prices that were passed onto us don’t hold your breath for that refund.

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    Best guess is that some corporations might get a refund since they paid the tariffs and they will pocket the money.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes but the refund is to the businesses that passed the cost of the tariffs on to the consumers.

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    ur telling me taxing Switzerland for having a Woman president isn’t a national emergency? Did I mention her voice was bitchy and she was a womans?

  • RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Posts like this show how economic messaging has become central to politics. At the end of the day, most people just want affordability and clarity about who’s responsible for what.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      1992, a Clinton campaign catchphrase was, “It’s the economy, stupid” and the New Deal in 1933 was about “economic messaging”. In 1890 Republicans lost big time in part due to the McKinley tariffs. Economic messaging in the U.S. has been central to politics for far longer than living memory.

  • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    The refund isn’t for us. It’s for his buddies that pre purchased the right to collect those refunds with significant windfalls on both sides of the transaction.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Supreme Court actually ruled that it must be given back. Who does it go to?

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The corporations who ‘paid it’. Not the people who paid the increased price but the companies who paid the tariff. So hundreds of companies are about to get a massive influx of money, once again courtesy of the American taxpayers.

      Are you winning yet, America?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Whoever paid the customs duty. Importers, wholesalers, etc. They may have language in their contracts which requires price easing, rebates, or even pay packs to their customers in an event like this. Those commercial sellers are unlikely to pass the refund any further (if they get any money at all).

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Oh it’s much worse than the way Newsom sanitizes it here. Trump’s plan is to personally steal billions from us by sending that tariff revenue to his mock UN “Board of Peace” outside US law, which then gives it directly to him.

      • nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        They sorta have to agree (because of sovereign immunity). But there are laws like the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act that already (probably) pave the way for this lawsuit. Additionally, if the government is acting outside statutory authority (ultra vires), sovereign immunity doesn’t protect the same way.

        Also, this would almost certainly be heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which deals with tariffs and the like, and has its own rules and such. So… it’s complicated?

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    All the states should sue, then kicker us back the amount at tax time.

    Except the welfare red states.

      • hateisreality@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If it’s paying for Nazis to curb stomp citizen’s rights granted by the Constitution, while depriving us of the services our tax dollars pay for, while cutting the taxes of folks who will never want for anything in life‽ Fucking absolutely against them. My tax dollars are not the Nazis slush fund for concentration camps.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I applied for a federal job, was given an offer, and had that offer revoked because of Trump’s EO against trans people. This government is actively hostile to my existence and provides me little in return, so yes.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        When the federal government is illegally withholding funding for programs in blue states, justified based on Fox News fever dreams? Yes, taxation is literally theft. That’s the definition of theft - having money taken from you by force without receiving fair compensation in return. This is the federal government behaving less like an elected government responsible to the people and more like an occupying army. We’re seeing the federal government morph into a tribute empire, where red states militarily occupy and collect tribute from the blue states. The only difference between taxes and tribute is whether you get your share of the money back. When funds are being illegally held for political reasons? You’re damn right taxation is theft.

  • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is this where trickle down economics is supposed to work?

    As the companies that receive refunds will pass the money onto the customers who paid them?