NarrativeBear@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 天前[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1572arrow-down15
arrow-up1567arrow-down1image[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.lemmy.worldNarrativeBear@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 天前message-square83fedilink
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·29 天前You’re in the wrong community my dude
minus-squareevasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·29 天前And also not understanding of the average Rochester hills driver.
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·29 天前Nope. Fuck cars. All roads should be for cyclists.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 天前Bike lanes give guaranteed space for bikes, whereas a bike-compatible road can end up with road hogging cars giving no space for bikes, and I’m booked having to “filter through” when there’s traffic - which also increases risks for the cyclists
![[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d469ed6b-d0c3-44d0-a3a8-aafcf7dc2fff.jpeg){kind=link}
You’re in the wrong community my dude
And also not understanding of the average Rochester hills driver.
Nope. Fuck cars. All roads should be for cyclists.
Bike lanes give guaranteed space for bikes, whereas a bike-compatible road can end up with road hogging cars giving no space for bikes, and I’m booked having to “filter through” when there’s traffic - which also increases risks for the cyclists