President Trump promised to fill the appeals courts with “my judges.” They have formed a nearly united phalanx to defend his agenda from legal challenges.

  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lol I wish we could have one centralized authority that would unilaterally make all of the decisions for us. I think the executive branch would be the best place to start, and instead of voting, we can just let the current guy decide what he feels best.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      here’s a crazy idea but what if nobody is in charge and we all just collectively decide what we want through a system of consensus?

          • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, there’s plenty I’d change with our voting system and even who we vote on and the power they can hold, but voting is non-negotiable. Are you saying there’s a different form of consensus than voting?

            • bearboiblake@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Consensus decision making is different from democratic voting, yes, but the process is more democratic than simply voting.

              As far as I am concerned, representative democracy has been tested and failed spectacularly.

              We need something else, for sure.

              • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m all ears on a new system, even aside from representative democracy, but there are problems with just putting all things to a popular vote as well.

                I think we’re talking about the same thing just using different words, care to elaborate?

                • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  yep, popular vote is just dictatorship of the majority, so that’s pretty much a non-starter, too

                  i hope you don’t mind too much if I just drop a wikipedia link - sorry, I should be sleeping rn. check out the consensus based decision making article for more details on how it kinda works.

                  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Do you have anything more substantial I could read, that’s a bit too vague and it just sounds like voting but nothing passes.

                  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I’ll do that, but I don’t know if I’m going to be sold on not voting. Majority of people served is the best that I’ve heard of, and it would be a lot better of it was regionally decided but a the same time that has its faults too. That said I got some reading to do.