This in reaction to outrage over what amounted to massive instant free-for-all AI image manipulation without even consent.
While the backlash against Grok manipulation had a strong showing, still… remember the adage: “Some are more equal than others.”


I’m curious how much
propsection 230 could save them from in this instance since they don’t regulate or moderate the tool they built in any way and Grok seemingly may be able to post these edited images to xitter even when the user account is banned?Like. They don’t get protection from their own chatbot, do they?
Ok, i don’t have an answer but that would be an interesting court case