• acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Not angry at all, thank you for the concern.

    And yeah, English is terrible, the absolute divorce between writing and speaking being the most salient point for me. But it’s the lingua franca, you can’t not speak it if you want to interact in the world stage. But, for all its faults, I’m glad it replaced French in this role.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The invention of the printing press and of the dictionary at a time of great language change has been problematic for English spelling.

      Why do you feel English is better than French? I think English has most of the problems of French and then a whole bunch of its own, but I’m interested in your perspective.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I wouldn’t say better, just easier to learn the basics.

        For instance, it is a mostly incomplete language from a conjugation standpoint. While I love the communication power romance languages have in verbal conjugation, they do present an obstacle for learning.

        Plural is also quite easy in English, as are basic adverbs.

        If only English had consistent pronunciation rules like German, it would be a near prefect lingua franca.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          In confused by you saying that french verb conjugation is all three of: mostly incomplete, powerful and hard to learn. Did you mean inconsistent rather than incomplete?

          Would German make a better lingua franca?

          I’m told sanskrit is pretty logical.