Boiling lobsters while they are alive and conscious will be banned as part of a government strategy to improve animal welfare in England.

Government ministers say that “live boiling is not an acceptable killing method” for crustaceans and alternative guidance will be published.

The practice is already illegal in Switzerland, Norway and New Zealand. Animal welfare charities say that stunning lobsters with an electric gun or chilling them in cold air or ice before boiling them is more humane.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        much of what animals eat are parts of plants people can’t or won’t eat. I don’t actually believe any fewer plants would be harmed if people were vegan.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            if I grow a plant like corn, and I eat the kernels, and feed the cobs, stalk and ruffage to a cow, only one plant is harmed.

            • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              While this likely pans out with historical methods of meat production, alongside historical quantities of meat consumption, it breaks down when scaled up.

              This would signal towards a reduced meat consumption across a population. On an individual level, removing meat from the diet would be beneficial to offset those who aren’t reducing.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                On an individual level, removing meat from the diet would be beneficial to offset those who aren’t reducing.

                maybe it would be if the industry changed it’s production based on consumption. I don’t think that happens though

                • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  They aren’t producing for funsies. If people are buying less, they’re going to produce less in order to maximize their profit. If they don’t ramp down production in response to reduced consumption, they are losing money.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    If people are buying less, they’re going to produce less

                    that has never happened and there is no reason to believe it would

            • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Thing is, cattle is also fed with corn. Lots of it. More than you could eat yourself, compared to meat consumption.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      You’re talking to vegans not biologists or ecologists. They don’t have any idea how their food is grown, or what the ecosystem it’s grown in can support.

      I’ll share your downvotes o7