• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 天前

    When I was young and naïve in my 50s, I thought US cars had safety requirements, and the era of rolling death traps had been beaten back by Ralph Nader. Must’ve been my mistake. Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 天前

      Shut it libtard, “safety” is a made-up democrat hoax. Don’t wear your seatbelt, die like a real man.

      I feel it is probably necessary to add /s

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 小时前

        My grandfather 40 years ago rolled his Bronco II into a ditch while drinking and driving. I honestly believe he’d lived if he wore his seat belt. The accident ejected him and broke his neck…ending his life.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 天前

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Really? Are you actually surprised? The man who decided to put electric un-openable doors onto is the same man who took a chainsaw to the federal regulatory budget and got rid of any agency that had the the authority to rule on such an issue.

      To repeat:

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Nope, Elon Musk fired the people who were responsible for making his cars safe because Elon thought their recommendations cost too much and your safety is a sacrifice Elon Musk is willing to make if it makes Tesla stock value increase.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 天前

      For real. Mechanical handle hidden under the rubber cupholder is wild. As a European I’m amazed that it’s legal.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 天前

        I don’t see how prospective car buyers can see shit like that and not see it as indicative of much larger design issues lurking under the hood.

        Like, how do you see that and not immediately question the safety concerns of adding additional steps to escape the vehicle if there is an accident and the electric door loses power? How do you from there not question what other poor design decisions may have been made if something so obvious got through? Do people just not think about the things they’re spending 10s of thousands of dollars on?

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 天前

          A lot of prospective car buyers like the thing based on the few details they interact with during a test drive and don’t think any further ahead, just like with everything else in their lives.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 天前

          I think that most people just don’t think about such details. Personally I wouldn’t. I’d think about the ergonomics of the unlock mechanism when it works as intended, which sucks, by the way.

          But I wouldn’t really think about safety. It’s not my job. I would assume the industrial designer did their job, and that the regulator did theirs.

      • lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 天前

        I hate that others have jumped on the door handle trends. It’s like apple being “brave enough” to remove the headphone port. My car at least has the electric switch and mechanical backup on the same handle. I don’t love it, but you can’t get trapped inside.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Someone else posted a photo. It appears to be an obvious lever, not hidden under the cupholder.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 天前

      There is regulation. Tesla is just the first company to make a separate emergency handle. Other companies managed to figure out how to do it with one handle. Even with frameless doors.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 小时前

        Corvettes, going back to at least the C6 generation (2005ish) have electronic handles, but they have mechanical emergency pulls on the floor next to the door sill. Yes, messing with them will set off the car alarm if the doors are locked. Ask me how I know.

        I have no idea why anyone where it freezes would want electronic handles, especially ones that electronically self-present. I’ve had to yeet my frozen shit door open on more than occasion.