• MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They gotta avoid a land-and-sea open-war first. Dock everything domestic and let the buyers’ ships come to them. Refuse to sell to countries that don’t protect even their own ships.

    The US Navy is already interfering, and I never suggest they could stop it, but rendering it in-effective/irrelavent after a certain point seems achievable from where I sit. The US hasn’t won a land-war since Korea, and North Korea only really had China’s backing.

    Venezuela is surrounded by countries which have every reason to help them end-run US interference, and whatever excuse the US brings to the table this time, its not coming with UN, NATO, or any sort of “multi-lateral”-backing. Again, that’s what the US had in Iraq and Afghanistan, and those still endeded in failure.

    There’s no pretending its not about oil and territory this time.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Venezuela is indeed surrounded by countries that have ever reason to help the Venezuelans end-run with US interference; but each of those countries has their own oligarchy the the US has helped gain power within the last few years and are now neutral at best to Venezuela’s plight.

      Brazil and Colombia are the only exceptions and the right wing is expected to take control of it soon as well.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I wish you weren’t right, and Peru isn’t really bucking US influence in any meaningful fashion either. I’m afraid their mega-port may not even get built, or maybe environmentally or socio-economically that would be the better result.

        I’m neither an expert nor a local to be telling them how to live. Now if only my country wasn’t so certain that “expertise” and violence should rightfully override the sovereignty of others.