io@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agofor a better future for ur childrenpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1864arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1859arrow-down1imagefor a better future for ur childrenpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneio@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square82fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·5 days agoBombs are not environmentally friendly.
minus-squareRusty@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·5 days agoAverage person’s carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 days agoThat’s actually a statistical error, Carbon Bezos is an outlier who should not have been counted.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 days agoBut it’s just as easy to blow up with a bomb. So it evens out.
minus-squarejollyrogue@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoBombs from Raytheon are environmentally friendly. Making war environmentally friendly is what Raytheon is all about. Raytheon a green company! 👍🏽
Bombs are not environmentally friendly.
Average person’s carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
That’s actually a statistical error, Carbon Bezos is an outlier who should not have been counted.
But it’s just as easy to blow up with a bomb. So it evens out.
Bombs from Raytheon are environmentally friendly. Making war environmentally friendly is what Raytheon is all about. Raytheon a green company! 👍🏽
But what if we made them so? 🤔