• porcoesphino@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    for the killing of her abusive husband

    A pretty big part to miss

    I’m not saying that makes the situation just, just that it comes a long way in explaining the why

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, she was a victim of state and family-sanctionned pedophilia and child abuse, and she was trying to protect her son. In a sane country she would have been acquitted or given a slap on the wrist.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, great. Then include that

        It seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to me (but also uncertain from the information in the article), just an unreasonable omission of detail from the source