• dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yes but does it have to be dead at the time?

    I’m really not sure why they felt the need to point this out in the article.

    • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 minutes ago

      Yes, the first attempts via the more obvious approach of using a live mosquito were a lot trickier, because the techniques involved in persuading the mosquito to comply were outside of the highly-specialised knowledgebase of the team. That is, until one serendipitous moment when one particularly heavy-handed researcher accidentally killed a mosquito whilst trying to attach it to a printer. The surprise and elation that must have resulted when they realised they could use mosquito husks was, surely a sight to behold. The missing piece of the puzzle had finally fallen into place. Some might even say… by Divine Providence, perhaps?
      I daresay some of the project leads were kicking themselves nonetheless: “It’s so simple! Dead mosquito proboscises! Dead! Why didn’t I think of that?!”, etc. But I think we should go easy on them; we could all get a doctorate in the field of hindsight!
      In the end, just like many discoveries before it: penicillin, safety glasses, velcro etc., this breakthrough simply owes a lot to blind chance.