• ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe an unpopular opinion:

    It would be nice if the r word was not a medical condition and just a word, the word has a good sound to it in my language. I would trade easily the r word for dumb or something like that. Dumb in Portuguese is awful

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      was not a medical condition and just a word

      It is just a word. It means to delay or the opposite of “advance” and is still used like that in industries like aviation and terms like fire removedant.

      But when you use it to call someone stupid, that’s when you’re using it in the context of ablism and as a slur.

      Similar to the term for a female dog, which is still used in veterinary medicine and research to mean an actual dog that is female. Though like the R word, the context as a slur is gradually discouraging its use even as its original meaning because people don’t want to risk having it misunderstood.

    • ashenone@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No i feel you. Honestly we do need a woke slur that isn’t homophobic, racist, sexist, ableist, etc.

      • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Piece of shit. Simple and to the point. Shit’s pretty gross and it’s universal human instinct to avoid it. Maybe even shithead if you want a single word.

        Asshole. Gender neutral and not tied to ethnicity since we all have one. Maybe even going further and calling someone an asshole related condition like prolapsed rectum or hemorrhoid, things that can happen to anyone, are pretty painful and definitely to be avoided, but AFAIK were never conditions that were heavily marginalized or shamed.

        Clown or fool. Clowns/fools are types of characters people played historically (and still do?), IMO it doesn’t imply anything about a person’s actual intelligence or mental state, only their actions. You’re not born a clown or fool, but you can definitely act like one. Also lends itself to a snarky 🤡 emoji I’ve seen some people here use instead of typing out an insult.

        Though there could be additional context or history to any of these terms I’m not aware of that push them into one of the -ist categories, IDK I’m not a linguist.

          • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Ghoul is the only really good one in the list. Its a generic feind thats in no way cool.

            Rogues and vampires are cool.

            Sycophant is good when someone’s being a sycophant. But you can be independently ghoulish.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’d argue it depends on how you use it. Calling Bezos a blood-sucking vampire of a man that lives more the more he feasts on others is pretty insulting, I’d say.

              • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It should be, but vampires are alluring which belies their evil. That’s the cautionary part of the fiction.

                Is Bezos a soulless ghoul cannibalizing the festering, necrotic wound of poverty which he grows larger every day? Yes, and in no way can that be conflated to being sexy.

          • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I feel like there needs to be a good word for someone who has the capacity to do better burlt chooses to dwell in ignorance and should be ashamed of that.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Deeply unserious usually works. They aren’t taking things seriously, or putting in any actual effort, just coasting along on their preconcieved notions.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Many of the bad words have that nice ring in my language, if only they weren’t offensive… I would totally trade 'em

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean I guess that is why they are offensive words. They are bad to use even if you know they sound so good to shout. Otherwise they would just be fun shout words like “purple nurple!”.