After the whole Syncthing-Fork debacle, I’ve been considering what to do, and I discovered that Syncthing Tray has experimental Android builds. I’ve noticed the UI is kind of buggy (not really a surprise since they’re experimental builds), so I was wondering if anyone has actually used it and could provide a comparison with Syncthing-Fork. I’m especially interested regarding battery life and so on given that that was the main benefit of Syncthing-Fork over the original app anyway before the original app got discontinued, and obviously I’d like to know if it syncs well or if there are any weird issues.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I have no intent to upgrade from my current version (1.27.9) as it’s been fine for years now.

    It works, does what I need. There was an update a few months ago, but it offers nothing I need, and would only cause me a ton of work and re-testing to ensure it works as it currently does.

    Apps don’t need continuous updating if they work.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thing is, even using this new app it’s still ST underneath, using their Discovery servers. That’s as big an issue as anything.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      Syncthing itself is fine. Syncthing-Fork, a completely separate project that wraps Syncthing into a neat app for Android, is what’s going through the repo drama.

      Besides - it looks like the new repo owner is pretty transparent about the whole thing and appears to be making good-faith efforts to keep the original Syncthing-Fork devs involved.

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Whats the issue with using their discovery servers? Has something changed regarding this?

  • MalReynolds@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Eh, Syncthing-Fork is basically feature complete, it’s not even a significant exploit threat (on gOS and constrained to local network and storage spaces in my case, but probably in general). I just pinned it at v2.0.11.2 in F-Droid and will wait for things to shake out. If things go badly there’ll be a Syncthing-Fork-Fork, it’s too critical to too many peoples workflows.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      To your point, the developer of an iOS Syncthing client (Möbius) has financially support ST development for at least 3 years that I know of. I don’t know how much, but they use it for their own clients, so it’s important to them.

      My only concern would be the Discovery servers.