• TriplePlaid@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    From my perspective it is worth pointing out because it shows how Kirk’s murder was NOT a good thing, and is NOT something that should be looked back upon with glee. Rather than being the end of Charlie Kirk’s vision for Turning Point, his death invigorated it and has now potentially set up an entire generation to be propagandized.

    It would have been better for the world for Kirk to have kept living and continue embarrassing himself (which he did on a daily basis) and come to a more typical end for these far right influencers - jailed/disgraced. Not to mention that noone deserves to be executed, especially without a trial.

      • TriplePlaid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m confused - are you trying to argue that we should not try to stop the spread of hateful propaganda? Or just that it doesn’t matter to have it in schools? Maybe you are trying to argue that exposing children to hateful rhetoric will not have an impact on their developing brains?

        What you are saying does not make sense to me.

        • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m saying that shooting Kirk had nothing to do with hateful people finding their way to hate propaganda. If their reasons for joining a known hate group are that thin, they would have joined it anyway, or a different one, or started their own.