Edit: /j

  • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    When you look at why people did the enslaving you will inevitably find someone who is creating hierarchies by abusing some facet of the material conditions of the time. Slavery is not a part of human nature.

    • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So you will always find a person who is doing the enslaving but enslaving isn’t human nature? I dont know how to follow that logic.

      Let’s take another class of slaves: domesticated animals. We’ve been doing that for a looooong time. We like them, but we don’t consider them our equals and will in general readily murder them or sacrifice them to meet our needs. Most of what you eat has about the intelligence of a toddler. Cats and dogs we enslave as our emotional support are also intelligent creatures.

      Since resources are always finite all creatures default to exploitation as a survival system. Humans are good at making up stories for why it’s ok actually, but that doesn’t mean it is.

      • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Finding an exception to the rule and then claiming that exception is the rule is kinda wild. The vast vast vast vast majority of human beings do NOT engage in exploitation of each other. As such I do not believe exploitation is a part of human nature but is rather a manifestation of anti social behavior intersecting with the material conditions of the time. Humans are egalitarian and communal by nature, things that pull us from that are aberrations to our nature not pillars of it.