• theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Where exactly does that money come from? We end up paying more for it in the end due to inflation and it all trickles up as we spend it.

    We need to raise taxes on the ruling class. There is no other way.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he’s obviously lying?

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

      Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

      This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Because in theory that’s just what news outlets should be doing. He says something and they should bring that to the people. Whether or not it is a lie or the public considers it a lie is not news YET. We’re better of receiving this information even if we know it to be a lie because we should be up to date of whatever the turd is saying.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, it really isn’t. That’s a press release. Or the Truth post Trump made.

        News filters for worthy events, explains mechanics, and adds other context to help its readers understand why this thing is worth knowing and what it might mean.

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    13 hours ago

    $2000 a person won’t even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he’s given us.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 hours ago

      When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think a lot of people don’t get this.

        Imagine there’s something that you want–maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn’t matter.

        What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it’s a few dollars or maybe it’s as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

        This is how the wealthy view anything that is “only” in the thousands of dollars.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    What’s high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke…

    The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. “You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president’s agenda – you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans.”

    Oh so no money for you

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be “hidden” relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s what I get out of it… something they can say they did… but its actually nothing…

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They want to let us deduct our auto loans? I haven’t heard that one yet. My car payment is crazy high though lol

  • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that’s $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won’t change anyone’s life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      $2k is a whole lot of money, especially if you consider that most people will immediately spend it, so other people will earn it. a dollar goes much further than only one dollar if it moves through many hands.

      also, what do you think is the total cost that tariffs have cost you since january?

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Trump steals people’s money, then gives some back to them, and that’s supposed to pacify them?
    How about not stealing people’s money to begin with?

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      14 hours ago

      and that’s supposed to pacify them?

      Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It doesn’t actually sound like anyone will get a check “lots of ways” probably means it’s never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s weird, because the COVID checks were insanely popular and just giving everyone a $2000 check with his name on it would be great politics. I guess it’s good they’re doing it differently.

          • TheFogan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well you have to factor 2 things, there still was a battle with congress to get those checks out during covid. (I remember Bernie walking into congress with the massive printout of trumps tweet saying he was going to send out checks), and of course factoring in that trump knew he wanted to get elected again. It’s 3 years away from the next presidential election… and him getting a 3rd term probably doesn’t involve an election.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            that was pretty much hamstrung by lich mcconnel, who laughed at the idea of giving poors anything, hes worst than trump by the way, until THE LICH WAS PRESSURE to vote on it.

  • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lol, bet he’s only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He’s just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The ultra wealthy already got their ‘tariff dividend’, in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

    As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

  • Splount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In two weeks. Very special. Don’t want to say much now but it’s gonna be really special.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

      He started with “solving crime in Chicago in 1 day”

      Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he’s gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.