Again, your original argument is that the courts don’t do chicken shit to stop the administration.

Your entire argument here rests on Trump being granted a temporary emergency stay by a democratic supreme court justice. That stay is set to expire after the lower appeals court makes a final decision regarding the second order given by judge McConnell, that USDA provide full SNAP funding vs only providing the partial funding the administration already agreed to pay after McConnell’s first order was handed down the week before.

Why did the Trump administration seek an emergency stay from the supreme court in a district where they knew the case would be decided by a Biden appointee? Because the circuit court making the final decision on McConnell’s ruling, declined to grant the administration a stay when they first appealed. The Trump administration then cited the lower court’s refusal to grant a stay, to their running list of examples they claim are targeted acts of unfair “judiciary activism” by democratically appointed judges. In other words, they are claiming any orders handed down by judges that hinder the administration’s agenda are politically motivated attacks against the administration, while actually carrying out politically motivated bullshit like using SNAP funds as a bargaining chip.

US Supreme Court lets Trump withhold $4 billion in food aid funding for now

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who issued the stay, set it to expire two days after the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rules on the administration’s request to halt a judge’s order that the U.S. Department of Agriculture promptly pay the full amount of this month’s SNAP benefits, which cost $8.5 billion to $9 billion per month.

Jackson, the liberal justice assigned to review emergency appeals from a group of states that include Rhode Island, said the 1st Circuit was expected to rule on the administration’s request to block McConnell’s order “with dispatch.” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi noted the Supreme Court’s decision in a post on X, which paused a court ruling she deemed “judicial activism at its worst.”

Pretty sure you’re well aware of this already, but when you argue that judges “don’t do chicken shit,”/might as well not even exist, guess who you’re actually helping by spreading disinformation and propaganda?

DOJ’s No. 2 Official Asks Lawyers to Join ‘War’ Against Judges

“It’s a war, man,” Blanche, the deputy attorney general, told judges and lawyers Friday at a Federalist Society event in Washington, before describing instances where the government has ping-ponged between lower and appellate courts. “It’s happening over and over and over again.”

The DOJ is saying they are at war, and targeting the judges you claim with such certainty don’t actually do “chicken shit.” If you’re looking for work, you’d make a very useful tool for the DOJ’s propaganda machine. For some reason they need to eliminate those “useless” Federal judges and their meddling “judicial activism” that doesn’t actually do anything.