In your opinion which one made you noticed people mindset getting dumber, superficial, vain, zombie-like or worst?

  • Reddit
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • Snapchat
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    YouTube for me. I just realized I’ve been experiencing brain-rot like symptoms (i.e. unable to concentrate, think deeply in realtime, continue conversations without much pre-thinking) for the past few years because I watch too much Lets Plays as a substitute for human interaction.

    • Lunatique Princess@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well, good thing you’re fixing it. Avoid YouTube shorts at all costs. Basically the same for tik too videos and Instagram reels.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s not clear people are any dumber. People have always been dumb, and “everyone’s getting dumber” has always been a popular take - it used to be about too much TV; much earlier Plato blamed poetry.

    I do see it wrecking people’s mental health and burning up their time and money. And that’s not even getting into how much power we’ve handed these companies over our devices and personal information in the process.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Tiktok, since it has made young people totally addicted to it. Most likely ruined many early brains so people cant live without constant dopamine hits. And probably ruined many school grades and future careers as well.

    Its an escape from the world that is so shitty that people need mental relief from it.

    Endgame capitalism.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s crazy to me that there is a whole generation (not only, even tiktok people my age) lost the attention span to watch a movie anymore. Watching a movie used to be peak entertainment, you’d plan it in advance and hang out with friends. I had a date some time ago and she told me she would beowse tiktok when nothing happens in the movie, she claimed that she can multitask really well. we watched a tv show and she was more browsing than watching. Every now and then she would look up and wait until something funny or possibly important happened, laughed or repeated it, just to look back at the phone. I told her that we can do something else if she wanted, but she still claimed it’s fine, she can do both. We watched the same episode 2 1/2 times, and she never realised.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yep their brains need constant dopamine. Ive also noticed in new movies how they often start with a huge action sequence to get the viewer interested, and frequently keeps throwing silly action scenes in all the time.

        You can compare this with movies from the 80s and 90s that are much slower but actually have genuine characters that are very likeable instead.

  • JupiterSnarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think most of them have all done severe damage but in different flavors, perhaps with a little overlap between flavors. TikTok creates stupidity/zombiemind/brainwashed. Twitter creates fascists. Facebook creates idiots. Instagram creates egomaniacs and narcissists. Reddit is all over the place because it’s a collection of different sub-platforms.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Facebook killed family members. No really, COVID got them and they didnt recover. They got all their news from Facebook. Not from anything close to official. Facebook was all they were on 24x7. That and Fox news. It was sad but what can you do? Its the new Darwin award and Facebook facilitated it.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t mind the flood of spam, right-wing nonsense, and guesstimated content in the browsing streams quite so much if I at least there was a useful bias for seeing what people on my friends’ & subscribed lists were posting, but NOOoooo… (cue John Belushi)

      At this point they’ve hilariously turned their own product in to something that doesn’t hold even the slightest bit of value for me, anymore. I really need to send Zuck a nice gift-basket of elephant dung for doing me that helpful favor. 😊

  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Twitter/Bluesky/Threads/Mastodon

    Twitter and it’s imitations have taught us quote-dunking, by extension the idea that online debates are productive, and the idea that nuance is a waste of words. Outside of that it’s just algorithmic curation in general that’s damaging so all the other sites are equal.

      • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Same system. Just because it’s more moral on the backend doesn’t mean it escapes the concept of twitter arguments and filter bubbles.

        • bear_delune@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think it’s pretty arguable that it does.

          Not being algorithmically driven, the absence of an incentive for incendiary content goes a lot way to change the tone of the spaces.

          Not to mention all the other ways the platform is operationally different from these other for profit platforms.

    • BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have to agree. And this is pervasive enough that lazy articles about tweets are now a major percentage of online “news”. So-and-so destroys x-and-such on Twitter!" So what? It doesn’t change anything or anyone’s mind.

  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s hard to compare between platforms because of how they cater to different audiences, but if we’re going off sheer numerical scale towards social unrest, Facebook is the clear frontrunner.

    The main reason is Facebook Zero, the program established to provide access to the platform in developing and under resourced nations at no costs to the users (with some exceptions), leading to billions of users around the world to view Facebook as “The internet” ™.

    Wikipedia link to Facebook Zero: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Zero

    Criticism of Facebook Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Facebook

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anything that encourages the sharing of small snippets of information, elevates the prominence of misinformation thanks to engagement algorithms and reduces discourse to simple 3 word responses have caused the most damage.

    So facebook/instagram/tiktok/twitter.

    Reddit wouldn’t count in my view. It encourages lengthier, more critical responses. Yes its an echo chamber in places but its also pretty easy to avoid toxic content.

  • Spinoza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Twitter ruined people’s image of reality. The echo chamber, the content generated for follower counts, the view that the perspectives on Twitter somehow represented what the mainstream population was concerned with, the entitlement that stemmed from each individual thinking they had and deserved a megaphone, the dumbing down of thoughts to meet character limits; that platform was severely detrimental to American society. In my opinion, these issues are far worse than the brain rot, vapid influencer schtick, and right wing radicalization the others generated.

    • Lunatique Princess@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Brain rots REALLY bad but yes twitters character limit alone was a instant decline in dialogue and commentary. I’ve honestly never used it to see an internal representation of how it’s doing damage mentally. So thanks for the insight with this comment

    • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fact that Xwitter became such an echo chamber and that people there really started to believe that they were the moral compasses of humanity made it gain the appropriate nickname, here in Brazil, of “Black (in the sense of rotten) Banana Institute”.