• MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As someone who loves aviation and space ships and the like: I sincerely have no idea why the rail isn’t more commonly used for intercontinental intracontinental travel. Yes all the hippie reasons it’s great, but also when you take into account all the costs that go into car travel from destination A to destination B on a trip that goes across states; it’s cheaper, faster, and more reliable. And arguably less stressful and more comfortable.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because of the costs of integrating an entire railway system into the continent that’s better or just as good as public transportation. You’re starting at a huge loss in hopes of an income.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would choose a rail option over flight even if it’s 50% longer. But even in West-Europe where Highspeed rail is well developed, it’s quite hard to find international rail options :(

      • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can’t speak to Europe’s rail system but in the US it’s horrifically underdeveloped. There are a few passenger lines still in operation, but for the most part it’s all freight.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re building Rail Baltica to connect the Baltics to the rest of Europe via rail, but riding it will cost more than a plane trip and take longer. Aviation needs to be more expensive for rail to even be competitive.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You mean intracontinental?

      I can think of several reasons trains aren’t used for most intercontinal trips.