• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s making fun of people not realizing that time has passed and that the 90s are now long enough ago to be seen as retro to people.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had a young colleague tell me that he loves retro games “like halo 2 and stuff”.

      Not even Halo CE man, couldn’t even give me that. Straight for the fucking jugular.

      • tal@olio.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not even Halo CE man,

        I mean, he’s right, though. It’s been a while.

        Halo: Combat Evolved came out in 2001, 24 years ago.

        Go back to 2001 and hack off 24 years, and you’re at 1977. In 1977 — late in 1977 — the Atari 2600 was released, so the equivalent would be an early Atari 2600 game. If you were playing Halo: Combat Evolved when it was new and someone proposed playing an early Atari 2600 game, it’d be hard to call it anything but retrogaming with a pretty hard emphasis on the “retro”.

        EDIT: It also does kind of highlight, I think, how the rate of change of video games has kind of slowed a lot.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atari_2600_games

        It looks like only nine Atari 2600 games were out in 1977. I think the only game on there I have played is Combat. I remember having fun with it, but if you compare Combat and Halo: CE versus Halo: CE to a current video game, the rate of change has fallen way off.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My local game store had about fifty copies of Combat when I was a teen. They sold for 1USD each. They never sold.

          Combat inflation is real.