Subtle, they were not. But that’s fucking brilliant!
I’m not posting an excerpt here because it’s your typical “officials tout censorship” boilerplate.
Subtle, they were not. But that’s fucking brilliant!
I’m not posting an excerpt here because it’s your typical “officials tout censorship” boilerplate.
Getting arrested for projecting a photo of two pedophiles. That’s definitely freedom of speech right there
There is no right to freedom of speech in the UK…
The counter-argument is that people would rather their view of the world heritage site not be affected by people with an axe to grind.
Ah, so political speech is now axe grinding. Got it.
Pretty poor counter argument.
“Justice for the abused” Vs “Oooh! Pretty building”
Now transpose this to a local land dispute, or personal rivalry, or other. The world is a lot more than Trump, and the law does have to reflect that.
It’s a projection. No damage has been done. It just dominates your view for a few minutes.
Even if you disagree with it, it’s such a mild form of protest to take exception to. Just let people express themselves.
It’s a projected image, not an engraving, not a painting.