• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yeah, people have been arguing about it for at least the last three years, since the first big twitter migration.

    Everyone just kind of ignored that you could screenshot a post and reply to it already.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If you screenshot the post, there’s no guarantee it’s not doctored

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s fine. The friction of typing in the person’s name to harass them from the screenshot does deter some people, it turns out.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Same. I like that it is hard to go viral. It feels more like people talking and less like influencers (although there are some.)

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            At the same time, the lack of virality may hurt it since it feels much more like a burgeoning project. One of the draws for someone coming off of Twitter would be feature parity, and Mastodon feeling less complete and much smaller wouldn’t help.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yup. There’s just something that makes social media better when you are forced to be more intentional about it.