• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    Yes. The relevant metric:

    99.55% of posts are on a single instance. That is not “federated” in any meaningful sense.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 天前

      I’m moreso curious if it federated in a literal sense. Is it even possible to participate without using bsky.app’s servers?

      • f314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 天前

        Self-hosting a Bluesky PDS means running your own Personal Data Server that is capable of federating with the wider Bluesky social network.

        Seems like it

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 天前

            No it doesn’t. If other people on bluesky servers want to see your content then obviously it will go through bluesky servers, but if you connect to a 3rd party relay and use a separate appview like zeppelin.social and use DID:Web for account ID then nothing involving the bluesky servers was used and it still behaves like native

          • f314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 天前

            Oh, I misunderstood. So you mean federating with their network from other software implementing the AT Protocol? From skimming the docs it looks like it should be possible as long as you implement the correct schemas, but I didn’t dive very deep.