• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    When Facebook or openai or whoever is like “oh we didn’t mean for this consequence of our decisions” is that supposed to be an acquittal? If you make a machine that shoots rusty nails out sometimes, and you know this, and it kills people, that’s still some sort of crime or civil suit.

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Wait until it inevitably gets purposefully and actively weaponized. We’re so not ready for this…

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    […] Experts Say

    It’d be really interesting to interview an expert in the field of mental issues, psychosis… and not random people on the streets and an anthropologist. I’d say this article is likely true, especially the sycophancy part… But I think at this point there’s sadly zero science behind this. The issue is real, though. And a sore point in society.

  • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Stopped using other AI’s and use Proton Lumo which is encrypted. It’s not as good as some of the others (or so they claim to be) but that just means I’m not relying on it as much.

    I just wish Proton would improve it’s handling of photos and videos in its cloud storage.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Stopped using other AI’s. Problem solved.

      P.s. I upvoted you 'cos Proton does seem like one of the least problematic ones in terms of privacy, but it too uses NVIDIA and Mistral as upstream sources, which have been opaque about their dataset sources - so it’s still likely just as unethical.