• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    7 days ago

    ICE did not comment on the accuracy of Skinner’s purported identifications, but in a statement, ICE spokesperson Tanya Roman said that the masks “are for safety, not secrecy”

    says the party of covid deniers

    • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s just laughable. The safety is literally the secrecy. Or vice-versa. They’re keeping themselves, secret, keeping themselves safe. Every one of of them should be doxxed.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Weren’t there statistics saying gaiters weren’t really effective for filtering? Also, the whole point of wearing a mask to not let you spread anything?

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        the mask yes matters more that it helps if the person themselves has it, from spreading it to others. but still does offer a level of protection for yourself (not to the same degree as the sick person wearing it).

        Wearing a mask is like a rampant person running around peeing. If the person peeing is wearing pants, it blocks most of the urine from spreading. If you wear pants, it still offers a level of protection more than if you chose to not wear pants to avoid the pee.

        The reason why it was important for covid is that there are many asymptomatic carriers, so unless you can prove to everyone around you that you DIDN’T have it without wearing a mask, you should be treated as potentially having it.

        • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Thus, a world where we don’t protect each other is like an ouroboros of peeing Calvin stickers.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This doesn’t unmask them. It produces hallucinations of what the AI dreams the person might look like, and then feeds it into another system to see if that artwork looks close to any other photo online.

    Do this an infinite number of times, and every person with a photo online is identidied as an ICE agent.

    Skinner acknowledged that the technology is flawed, and he said that about that 60 percent of the AI-generated results and facial recognition searches lead to wrong matches on social media profiles

    Yep

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    ICE agents “don’t deserve to be hunted online by activists using AI,” said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), who chairs the Senate Homeland Security subcommittee on border management and the federal workforce.

    Get wrecked, James.

    ETA: James, WHAT COUNTRY DOES OKLAHOMA BORDER?

    Shut the fuck up.

  • londos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    “This tool supports law enforment by verifying that masked individuals commiting crimes while refusing to identify themselves are actual ICE agents rather than just imposters.”

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not doxing, it’s documenting

      You know, for the Vancouver trials (or wherever we end up having them)

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly. Police are public property, as are federal employees, they are on our payroll, they didn’t get to be anonymous.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Also true, but also this just isn’t doxing. This isn’t revealing personal information from people on the Internet, this is identifying people doing things in the real world

          If you kidnap someone, it’s not doxing to identify you on the news or on Twitter. It’s literally identifying criminals

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Public servants lol, not public property. This country did at least manage to ban most forms of slavery. Most.

  • Pavidus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Washington CAN do something about it. Remove the masks. The more they mask up, the more people should as well.

  • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sure they can: they can order the ICE domestic terrorists to go unmasked - no way to unmask them with AI.
    And while they’re at it, they can make them wear pseudonymous identifiers.
    In a law and order state (by meaning and not only name) this would be a given. The difference from it tells a lot.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Pretty typical “the answer is no” to a click bait title that asks a question.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean they are the ones that wanted no guardrails on AI. They want all the benefits but none of the downsides and I’m sure they’ll prove that in the next couple weeks.