TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoDo you think he'll respond?lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1462arrow-down112
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageDo you think he'll respond?lemmy.blahaj.zoneTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareKazuchijouNo@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoI’d move the word “hypotetically” a bit further, so that it says: “How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!” There, now it’s better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
minus-squarezqps@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoExactly, none of them are innocent, so that part is just plain irony. “hypothetically terrorize” makes sense because simply identifying as anti-fascist can get you on terror watch lists these days.
I’d move the word “hypotetically” a bit further, so that it says:
“How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!”
There, now it’s better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
Exactly, none of them are innocent, so that part is just plain irony. “hypothetically terrorize” makes sense because simply identifying as anti-fascist can get you on terror watch lists these days.