destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThe hidden subway that New York refuses to build | NYC is one step closer to having a mayor that actually cares about transit and people. Maybe this isn't so far-fetched now.www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down15
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkThe hidden subway that New York refuses to build | NYC is one step closer to having a mayor that actually cares about transit and people. Maybe this isn't so far-fetched now.www.youtube.comdestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoOh. Yes. Means testing us not cost efficient.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoWhat is the point you’re trying to make here?
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoAlso, what does this have to do with means testing?
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThats what charging money for tax funded tra!sit amounts to. It’s usually an anti homeless measure.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoRegressive taxes are far, far more cost efficient than means testing. And like I said, the costs saved by eliminating fare are already factored in. They’re $33 million per year, and I added an extra $52 million on top of that for good measure.
Oh. Yes. Means testing us not cost efficient.
What is the point you’re trying to make here?
Also, what does this have to do with means testing?
Thats what charging money for tax funded tra!sit amounts to. It’s usually an anti homeless measure.
Regressive taxes are far, far more cost efficient than means testing. And like I said, the costs saved by eliminating fare are already factored in. They’re $33 million per year, and I added an extra $52 million on top of that for good measure.