• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    14 hours ago

    not settled on bollards?

    I remember, maybe last year, there was city “debate” over installing bollards at intersections to protect cyclists and pedestrians. From what I recall, NIMBYs pushed HARD against the idea, saying it was “confusing” and “dangerous” for motorists…

    Anything to save lives or improve safety tends to be an automatic “NO!” in most places because of NIMBYs.

    That’s why certain safety projects should just move forward without public input.

    • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You’re giving me flashbacks to the implementation of traffic roundabouts in my country. They’ve been used for a long, long time all over the world with minimal complication, but people were talking as though the cities were reinventing the fucking wheel. Long story short, they got installed anyways and work fine - much ado about nothing lol

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        installed anyways and work fine - much ado about nothing lol

        most conservative pushback goes like that. “This change is scary and bad!” -> change is good, actually. Often, the conservatives will then fight to defend against the thing they fought against before. It’s just kneejerk emotions.

        • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Too true, they’re easy as pie, and not so tricky as a pedestrian either (the queuing feels off because of the way that cars don’t automatically come to a stop at a red light).