• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Uhh. Wouldn’t the terrorist just swerve around it and hit them anyways…?

    This is clearly for accidents dude, the hell kinda stretching you doing here?

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        For YOUR image, of course bollards are used, but you see how in your image they COMPLETELY block access? And in how OPs picture you can swerve around? The ad is for fucking accidents lmfao.

        Totally different scenarios mate.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s just for different scenarios. Complete bollards are used for terrorist scenarios, while OPs is used for accidents.

        People are apparently too focused on their bias to comprehend that… different scenarios exist with different solutions. Don’t conflate them because you have an axe to grind.

    • MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think cars are pretty terrifying most of the time. And that’s the point. We’re supposed to be terrified to use the roads, because we might be run over. That’s terrorism. They even told us it’s our own fault when we die, because using the roads is “jaywalking”.