• pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ahh yes, Wikipedia is wrong, books on aluminium and scientific naming are also wrong, evidence…? trust me bro. Once again you keep the parts from Wikipedia you like, but discard facts counter to your point.

    What’s the point in engaging further, we’ve reached peak comedy. 👌

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Agreed. I have said people ignored the books and dictionary entries, the word Aluminium and MANY others never caught on. You just keep pointing to those books.

      The US literally “noped” out of the word Aluminium and refused to use it. If Im wrong, then why arent we saying it today?