Many citizens who don’t want to explain their employment status pay to rent a position in a fake office, with some even assigning fictitious tasks and organizing supervisory rounds

For a daily fee of between 30 and 50 yuan ($4-$7), these companies offer desks, Wi-Fi, coffee, lunch, and an atmosphere that mimics any work environment.

According to a report in Beijing Youth Daily, although there are no contracts or bosses, some firms simulate them: fictitious tasks are assigned and supervisory rounds are even organized.

For a fee, the theatricality can reach unimaginable levels, from pretending to be a manager with his own office to staging episodes of rebellion against a superior.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    not all companies, but companies trying to fire an employee till they willigly quit will force them to do remidial stuff. due to strong labor laws in japan, its required that BOTH the company and employee agree to quit/get laid off to actually be an official transaction. its part of the reason why an employee might feel like theyre stuck in a company their entire life.

    emphasis again, this does NOT apply to all companies

    • dbtng@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thx for finally explaining this for me. I’ve not quite understood it till now.
      Not knowing this detail made some Japan stories very odd.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        its more or less the pro/con of strong labor laws vs at will.

        strong labor laws guarantees both sides will have some body to work a position, but theyre almost handcuffed together forever, so its extremely imperative to find the correct candidate.

        at will has poor job security, but you have the freedom to get out of the contract with the other party as long as its not a protected reason. at will lets people jump jobs more often which is better for increasing your pay. but it has a shit saftey net, so the people at the bottom struggle.

        • Echinoderm@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Chaining someone to a job sounds more like indenture than strong labour laws.

          Actually strong labour laws let employees choose to work for a different employer, while requiring the employer to have a valid reason to dismiss the employee.