MuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · edit-22 days agoTrump admin permits sale of device that allows standard firearms to fire like machine gunswww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1362arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1351arrow-down1external-linkTrump admin permits sale of device that allows standard firearms to fire like machine gunswww.nbcnews.comMuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square105fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareOmegaMan@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·1 day agoSupreme Court unbanned it 6-3. Not really Biden’s call.
minus-squarePhoenicianpirate@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down12·23 hours agoI said unbanned under Biden. I didn’t say he actually did it.
minus-squareOmegaMan@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·19 hours agoSure, but “under” implies he had authority over the decision.
minus-squarePnut@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·17 hours agoIt shouldn’t. That’s not how it works.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 hours agoIt does when your preceding statement references a Trump decision, because that’s how rhetoric works
minus-squarePhoenicianpirate@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·19 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-square4am@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·18 hours ago“Then unbanned by the Supreme Court during Biden” would do just fine
Supreme Court unbanned it 6-3. Not really Biden’s call.
I said unbanned under Biden. I didn’t say he actually did it.
Sure, but “under” implies he had authority over the decision.
It shouldn’t. That’s not how it works.
It does when your preceding statement references a Trump decision, because that’s how rhetoric works
deleted by creator
“Then unbanned by the Supreme Court during Biden” would do just fine
Noted.