• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    From a cybersecurity perspective, it is nearly impossible to create a backdoor to a communications product that is only accessible for certain purposes or under certain conditions.

    Oh? It is possible? Pray tell, how?

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Screen recording or snapshots like Windows Recall. Or keyboard telemitry.

      But that’s it I think.

      • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s well known that iphone, google samsung and microsoft android keyboards are the most used keyloggers in the world.

          • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 day ago

            The NSA and advertisers. It was confirmed the MS Android keyboards were keyloggers after microsoft suffered a data breach revealing millions of typing records, so it’s not far fetched to assume windows does the same, especially after you see the sheer amount of data being sent straight to microsoft servers when analysing traffic.

  • Entertain529@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    The real challenge is getting loved ones to care enough to use a FREE encrypted communication app.

    Its like they see privacy as an anti-feature and would rather leave the door wide open for anyone to come rummage through their messages.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    We are supposed to trust our governments however it is pretty obvious that a Trump could come along and seriously misuse the backdoors that were said to be necessary to protect us. It doesn’t matter if you trust the current mob, it’s a rogue future mob we have to guard against.

    • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Border guards searching phones and making arrests after finding anything critical of Trump, on the grounds of “extremism” is a pretty big indicator.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    They only need to succeed once. Just keeeeep trying and trying and trying, keep renaming the same turd to some new shiny acronym, and keep trying until you statistically have to succeed

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the law ever says that we are not allowed to have encryption, I am absolutely going to be one of the first ones going to jail because I’m not going to put up with that.

    The way I see it is you can throw me in jail where you then have to feed me, give me proper climate control, give me a place to sleep, etc. all on your dime.

    • Dzso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      How long do you think your rights in prison are going to last once they’ve eliminated your most basic rights outside of prison?

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean men are already getting raped in prisons, it’s only a matter of time that they introduce electric-chair torture

    • underline960@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      throw me in jail where you then have to feed me, give me proper climate control, give me a place to sleep

      Hope you don’t live in the United States. You might end up in a Salvadoran prison. Or, almost as bad, an American one.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lol, fair point. I suspect though that so many people would just ignore that as unlawful that they would have no way of possibly enforcing it.

      • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is a huge part of how the system’s rigged against you, it gives incentive for the most braindead laws, which don’t benefit society in any way and make up for police incompetence, designed to imprison as many (poor) people as possible such as the conjoined enterprise laws in the UK, and is also a huge reason cannabis is criminalised in so many places.

    • mrbubblesort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I get it, it’s internet hyperbole. But dude, if that happens please fight back. Protests, voting, or god forbid gunfire if need be. But don’t just give up and die, that’s what they want.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        For the entire time I have lived on this planet, I’ve been pretty confident that my daily activities would generally be considered legal, and that the Federal Government had literally zero reason to be interested in me or anything I did.

        Now, though, I am aware that the government can disappear me and rendition me to a death camp, without trial and even without habeas corpus.

        As far as I can tell, if I’m being arrested I no longer have anything to lose. I am aware of that, and should it come to that, I understand why people are saying to act accordingly.

        That is as far as I am going to say in this conversation.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    I at least have a core group of friends that use Signal and I keep Element installed on my phone and computers hoping someday more people move to that over the next decade

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    No. Everything is still closed and not interoperable.

    I’ve just read about Google Wave.

    I think we need a global low-latency (no waiting an hour for a message to propagate) alternative to Usenet. And there should be two separate layers - unique article (or message) identifiers and the transport (be it lots of news servers exchanging articles as the main layer, or as an auxiliary level users exchanging them p2p with some way to verify an identifier and the fact that it was posted in some specific group by some specific person at some specific time). And cryptographic identities. And cryptographic alternative to DNS inside that - with name-to-identifier records signed and verifiable via a chain to some known name authority, not querying a service.

    An article can contain many things, it can be a hypertext page. It can, maybe, contain some header allowing to build articles into hierarchies with such a naming service providing paths. And navigate those with a browser. So you’d have a system friendly to mobile devices, to privacy, to economy of resources, to preserving information, to indexing and scraping.

    But I think I’ve missed something technical preventing this from being created in my thoughts.