just_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 24 天前Trump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1282arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1278arrow-down1external-linkTrump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comjust_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 24 天前message-square23fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
Losing everywhere in courts, so now you think you can just sidestep them by changing the constitution? Lolz
minus-squareLinktank@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up69arrow-down1·24 天前I don’t think they have the right to take that away.
minus-squareAshMan85@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·24 天前but they think they do and that is dangerous
minus-squareZak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 天前I’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
minus-squaresuburban_hillbilly@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·24 天前They don’t have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down2·24 天前“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it. It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·24 天前I dunno. The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts. I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
minus-squareAsafum@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-224 天前They have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.” :(
minus-squareHulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 天前They don’t have the right (because it’s illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they’ve done and yet here we are.
I don’t think they have the right to take that away.
They do not.
but they think they do and that is dangerous
I’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
They don’t have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.
It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
I dunno.
The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.
I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
They have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.”
:(
They don’t have the right (because it’s illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they’ve done and yet here we are.