I would say GitHub copilot ( that uses a gpt model ) uses more Wh than chatgpt, because it gets blasted more queries on average because the “AI” autocomplete just triggers almost every time you stop typing or on random occasions.
They did… You just refuse to acknowledge it. It’s no longer a discussion of simply 3Wh when GitHub copilot is making queries every time you pause typing. It could easily equate to hundreds or even thousands of queries a day (if not rate limited). That fully changes the scope of the argument.
No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points
If the premise of your argument is fundamentally flawed, then you’re not having a reasoned debate. You just a zealot.
Please articulate why the premise of my argument is fundamentally flawed
They did… You just refuse to acknowledge it. It’s no longer a discussion of simply 3Wh when GitHub copilot is making queries every time you pause typing. It could easily equate to hundreds or even thousands of queries a day (if not rate limited). That fully changes the scope of the argument.
GitHub copilot is not chatgpt
Yet again… You fundamentally have the wrong answer…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitHub_Copilot
https://github.com/features/copilot
GitHub copilot was literally developed WITH OpenAI the creators of ChatGPT… and you can run o1, o3, o4 directly in there.
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/using-github-copilot/ai-models/changing-the-ai-model-for-copilot-code-completion
It defaults to 4o mini.
Thank you
None of this was true of copilot for years, but I stand corrected as for the current state of affairs