• ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck that guy, fuck act, fuck anyone trying to take away public holidays. Ill take off Jan 2nd as a sick day and use it to piss on the door handles of acts office. Fuck them to hell. …and take away fair pay?? OH MOTHERFUCKER

    • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I genuinely don’t get why Labour doesn’t just run a campaign just repeating what these fuckers say they’re gonna do.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s talked me out of voting for him, that’s for sure. Safety regulations are written in blood, and building regulations are written in rotten and collapsed buildings.

        Absolute muppet.

  • Dave@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the party proposing to remove the building act, that specifies building standards. We don’t need building standards in an earthquake prone country, because if the buildings aren’t good you won’t be able to get insurance so the market makes sure the buildings are still up to scratch. Not making this up.

    The only surprising thing about this party is that they have so many supporters. But I fully believe most of their voters have no idea about their policies, and instead are voting for them because people want a change of government and don’t like the current National party.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, removing the building act is utterly moronic, I’m surprised their opposition isn’t making more noise about it.

      What a clown show of an election.

    • Xcf456@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has form too - this kind of thinking is how we ended up with the leaky building crisis

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they were in anyway intellectually consistent they’d also be proposing removing drivers license requirements - insurance would keep unsafe drivers off the road, and would totally be consolation for families of people killed by rich people

      • Dave@lemmy.nzM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You better hope they don’t hang out on lemmy. If they announce this as their next policy I’m blaming you!

        • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t imagine anyone in Act hanging out on the fediverse - open, decentralised community run by volunteers? At best that’s a commons that needs a good tragedy, at worst that sounds like communism

          • Dave@lemmy.nzM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I dunno, a “free speech” type instance seems like just the place some Act voters may hang out. Free to speak their minds in ways that mainstream social media would censor.

  • Xcf456@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    ACT courting the asshole vote by promising to make things worse in every way