• Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    OK then

    1. It is bad for the climate
    2. Its plagiarism
    3. We are literally putting our means of expressing ourselves into the hands of a few people. So once they just decide that cats are now not allowed, no one will be able to create memes about cats
    4. You are fueling a machine that google is selling to the genocide in Gaza.
    5. You will never be able to create new things. Since an AI only has relatively few nodes that are random (so it can output different things when given the same input) let’s say about 10% of your picture is actually new, and the rest plagiarised. You could just input that again and make it more random, but inputting something AI generated into an AI just makes it shit itself, it will not be „random” like an artist thinks about making a new way of expressing themselves”,but random as in „let’s just expose a drive to extreme radiation and see what the data looks like after 1000 bitflips
    6. The data collection. If a normal human collected that much data about me I could just sue them for stalking
      • Luffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?

        Also it dosent change any point except 2

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          There’s actually quite a few models that can run easily on a mid-range gaming computer (yes even for image generation, and yes they can run reasonably well) which…that same energy would probably be consumed by gaming so not really a huge difference.

          Microsoft even just released an open weights LLM that runs entirely on CPU that is comparable to the big hosted ones people are paying for

          Edit: just saw what community I’m in, so my comment was probably not appropriate for the community

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          The electric bills would not be high (per person) jsyk. It’d be comparable to playing a video game when in use.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?

          No, that sounds expensive

          Also it dosent change any point except 2

          It does actually

          • Luffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            No, that sounds expensive

            OK, so you just want everyone to just pull 20k out of their ass to buy themselves hardware to run a LLM on?

            It does actually

            Tell me how.

            • renzev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Whoa there buddy the post was talking about image generators, which run OK on consumer (albeit high-end) hardware. You’re the one who brought up LLMs.

              And how can google track me if it’s a thing running locally? Just pass --network=none to the docker container lol. Even then you’re arguably giving google more useful data by using gmail than any of their AI services. Do you go after every gmail user telling them that they’re supporting genocide? As for your fifth point, gauging whether or not something is original art by the permutation space of the medium is reductive. Is a base guitar less expressive than a harp because the musician is limited by the number of strings? Humans make art for many reasons, and one of those reasons is because its fun. Drawing with pencils can be fun, painting can be fun, writing prompts can be fun. People will keep on having AI art competitions because it’s fun while you’re sitting there in the corner seething about how all of them are genocide supporters. inb4 ad hominem, but honestly you sound insufferable.