return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前Supreme Court blocks, for now, new deportations under 18th century wartime lawapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court blocks, for now, new deportations under 18th century wartime lawapnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareJoe Breuer@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 年前This article says that Clarence and Alito dissented from the majority opinion (which I assume to be “no deportation without due process”). This thread reads differently to me… ELI5 please?
minus-squareCort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前Republicans, Thomas and alito (and Roberts) aren’t trump appointees. Trump appointees are gorsuch, Barrett, and boof kavanaugh. They all signed the majority opinion against Trump
This article says that Clarence and Alito dissented from the majority opinion (which I assume to be “no deportation without due process”).
This thread reads differently to me… ELI5 please?
Republicans, Thomas and alito (and Roberts) aren’t trump appointees.
Trump appointees are gorsuch, Barrett, and boof kavanaugh. They all signed the majority opinion against Trump