• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    welp I signed up for the waitlist.

    I’ll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I’ll move my main shit off to it.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’d consider it. If they host things outside of the US/start moving operations overseas, it’d be a lot more interesting. I sub to Proton for email, VPN, and drive support. Still hoping someday for proper Linux drive support so Mozilla/Thunderbird can target that

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m listening…

    But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Based on what I’ve seen in their forums it will be a paid service. I think it will be free at first for beta testers but I assume they are targeting people who currently use services like Proton.

  • Tea@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Out of all the articles and the official release announcement, you could share, you shared forbes which violate people privacy.

    Why?

  • Ray1992xD@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    No matter how much I hate Mozilla’s new path, companies like this challenging big tech are bold and have a lot of courage. If I set aside my personal op opinions about Mozilla, I actually admire them for this. They can actually dent big tech with funding from big tech itself.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I keep hearing a lot of negative comments about Mozilla lately. I’m wondering if this move is more in line with then just turning into another google rather than disrupting the marketplace.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          If they’re user funded, their incentives are fundamentally different from Google’s. Even thinking as a business, it makes no sense to enshittify the way Google does. It’s a different choice, even if it’s not the choice you wanted.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      For now, they’re better than Google. I have some bad opinions about them, but anything better than Google competing with Google is an improvement.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a saturated market and email is starting to disappear (it’ll take years, but the signs are there).
      They’d be better using it on the browser and ditching other products.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        No its never going to disappear. If you are referring to people using slack and chat apps, those are locked in walled gardens where your messages cant ever leave.

        Email can be moved anywhere easily.

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Email isn’t going anywhere. It’s the ipv4 of communication. You can list 100 things bad about it and none of it matters, too many things are now built on top of it, no competitor can possibly have a chance without first reimplementing email, and then they’re just adding extensions which everyone else ignores, and email continues.

        The more plausible threat to email is that it gets siloed into the top 5 or 6 providers and everyone else gets filtered out as spam (ie you need gmail, hotmail, etc or your emails will never reach anyone)

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sounded great until the “assist” ai feature. I friggin hate Gemini in gmail so any other kind of ai is an automatic nogo for me

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think it’s incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

    I’m not saying I know the answer- What I’m saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it’s not even considerable.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Firefox/Mozilla operated without any of the new additions for nearly the entire history of the internet until this year. If anything, “over”-reacting to the new policies was too weak a reaction. You do you and all, but I’ll agree to very strongly disagree.

      • britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

        Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You can’t know that with absolute certainty. Sorry, but if you’re using someone elses server for your communications and they’re not end to end encrypted, you should just assume that they can and do read your emails, and act accordingly.

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thunderbird Pro will apparently be:

    This email thing plus Thunderbird Send (which is basically https://send.vis.ee/), Thunderbird Appointment - a scheduling tool and Thunderbird Assist, which is:

    “…at least for now, being cautiously labeled as “an experiment” that will allow users to take advantage of AI features within their email. However, the goal is to be lightweight enough that the language models can be run locally on a user’s PC in the interest of privacy. This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

    So AI shit that nobody asked for or wants.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      This covers my thoughts about damn near every “helpful” feature this side of auto-complete email addresses.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        They said it will be opt-in and are trying to make it local-first. Their provider(?) apparently allows fallback to nvidia cloud compute when the hardware can’t handle it.

        I’m not using AI to write my fucking emails, regardless. Just wanted to let people know.

        p.s. Sorry, I’m dumb, skipped over quote in parent comment. Point is, there’s more to the service than optional AI bullshit, and you shouldn’t have to disable it.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      "[…] This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

      That’s a lot of words to say “we made an AI that totally won’t suck up your data, trust me bro”

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here’s what I want… I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don’t want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    So the Mozilla Foundation is gonna waste google money on email infrastructure? Hmmm… 'k… it’s not like their browser could use some love…

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        No there yet but not getting the love it deserved either.
        Maybe they oughta try asking for money like Wikipedia and KDE, maybe then they could become independent from Google and focus on actually developing a quality browser instead of making every app be about profit.

  • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    If this works out it might be a nice place to migrate to away from my self-hosted e-mail provided they eventually let you bring your own domain. Just sucks that e-mail is essentially the most secure thing you need to have since compromising that can compromise every account attached to the e-mail. That’s a lot of trust you need to instill in your e-mail host.

        • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I meant hosting wise, at home or using a VPS? How did you get a fixed IP/ what are you using for a proxy?

            • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Eh it depends. I’m fortunate enough to be in a good IP block so I don’t get my e-mails dropped purely on that. It’s been a good learning experience and I’ve leaned on my own server a number of times for troubleshooting at work since I can see the whole mail flow. The only problem I have is the free Outlook/Hotmail will not accept my e-mails. Everybody else seems fine. All that said, I don’t host anybody else’s e-mail so I haven’t had any spam come out of my IP, and I would never in a million years host e-mail for a customer.

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lol sure destroy all the trust with your users THEN launch an email service. Hard pass fro me.

    I guarantee you they’re already planning to train an LLM on everybody’s emails, or at least sell them to AI companies doing training.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yet thunderbird still can’t single click open an email in a new window. If I recall correctly the request has been filed in 2014 or smt 💀

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Nope, still requires double click.

        It’s almost like you didn’t read my comment and went straight to angry. This has been suggested for years with 0 response from Thunderbird team and there’s no way to extend it without forking and patching everything yourself.

        • dbbljack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you’ve done nothing but complain for 14 years then I’m glad you still have to double click.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lmao sure buddy i should have forked a web browser, learn their front end and patched everything myself! Ir you know fuck right off to a billion other email clients that don’t ship literally the most complex piece of software in the world with it 🙄

      • BangCrash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If only they could develop a federated short message system.

        Messenger/WhatsApp/slack messaging style but federated like email

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Email is federated, it’s just not really a medium people want to limit to 500 chars…

          Nothing at all stopping you from writing a client that only allows 500 char messages in and out.

          Someone even built a chat system that used email under the hood.

        • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Email was originally one of the first federated systems. Anyone can host a server and send messages back and forth from other servers with a set standard. That basically is federation.