cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 个月前Junior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1609arrow-down17
arrow-up1602arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 个月前message-square52fedilink
minus-squareOrvorn@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up71·2 个月前Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up31·2 个月前But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 个月前That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 个月前How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 个月前People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 个月前We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.