andioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 个月前well that's rudeprogramming.devimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imagewell that's rudeprogramming.devandioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 个月前message-square33fedilink
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up56arrow-down3·edit-29 个月前At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did. https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did.
https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories