Is there any benefit to host my own instance?

  • ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I did. The benefits as I see them:

    • I can still use Lemmy if the instance I would have used as my “home instance” ever went down.
    • Even if a public instance doesn’t go down, all this extra load is making strange bugs surface that I don’t encounter (I still have the live refresh bug everyone has, but not this one).
    • I have full control over my account.
    • If I ever want to get to customizing my UI later, I can.
    • Content I create originates on my instance, and I have full control over it. I can’t stop other instances from caching what I post publicly, but this still gives me more data governance.
    • I can curate my “All” tab to only show stuff I actually want to see, instead of trying to figure out how to block communities (not sure if that’s possible for regular users).
    • I get a custom domain which I think is pretty neat.
  • Korgen@lemmy.korgen.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I run my own instance, the benefit is privacy and reliability. Everything is controlled on your own server. You also aren’t reliant on someone else running an instance that could go down at any time, either permanently or an outage. Been a problem with Lemmy.ml recently.

    • jason@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      How is your RAM/storage usage? I’m interested in setting up my own instance (no communities, just a username that will always be here) but don’t want to upgrade my VPS again. I already had to do that spinning up a Mastodon server.

    • Kyoyeou (Ki jəʊ juː)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was asking myself a question, if you comment like you did here Is it saved in the server on which the original post is, or is it saved on your server?

      • SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Kind of both. His server has a mirror of the community. When he comments it gets saved on his server and the his server communicates with the original server. In turn the original server also communicates his comment with other federated servers.

        • pzza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If data is migrated from server to server, as the community grows in size, the data to be maintained on each server also grows in size? Also i’ve seen some servers allow the creation of new users/communities, but some don’t… whats the point of that if the data is just replicated anyway?

  • drdaeman@lemmy.zhukov.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pros: you [sort of] own your Fediverse identity; you can make any changes to your instance you want (if you know how to do it); you’re in control of whom you peer with.

    Cons: maintenance burdens (especially if you make any changes); content discovery complexity; possibly slightly less privacy (as you’re the only user of the instance, whatever is visible about it can be directly attributed to your activity). All solvable, of course.

  • idle@158436977.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I did it. So far I’ve noticed a few things, for example you have to populate/federate the communities yourself, and it can take a long time. It took hours to retrieve and catch up all the lemmy.world posts. I expect it to be an ongoing thing. When you first connect to a community, it downloads the first 20 posts, but all the comments are empty.

    The plus side though is it is very fast for me. And nobody can delete my profile.

      • Joe B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You gotta remember, The blackout brought us refugees I don’t think lemmy planned for this. I think the updates that are coming will address all of this. Reddit is decades old. Lemmy is new to all of us. We just gotta wait and eventually it will become second nature and we will be as good as Reddit

  • jon@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    From what I’ve seen and read, server to server traffic is less taxing on instances than client to server. So even if your instance is JUST you, it would be your instance talking to everything else so it would have some net benefit on the federation. But it would take a lot of users self-hosting solo instances for this to help in any noticeable way, I’d think.

    There is certainly no downside to running a solo instance, if you’re even slightly interested I would say go for it!

  • kring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you host your own, do you need to establish federation with all other instances or only with the ones you want to use communities from?

    If I only federate with lemmy.world, would I be able to see comments on /c/[email protected] on my instance made by a user from lemmy.ml?

    Would a user that reads /c/[email protected] on lemmy.ml see my comments, if I only federate with lemmy.world?

  • longyap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    less thing to worries like you dont need an email to use it from single user instance, lemmy now dont have 2nd authentication like totp at the moment and it may have risk to get pawned and leak your email address so yeah it is better to run your own single user instance

  • Johannes Jacobs@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me the benefit is uniformity (not sure if thats a word) i can have a matrix account, a mastodon account, a lemmy account, all sorts of fediverse accounts all under my own domain.

    This comes next to the already mentioned benefits ofcourse :)

  • Matt@netmonkey.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it’s a matter of personal preference.

    I’ve been running my own Mastodon instance for several months now, and I’ve enjoyed it. I don’t have to rely on someone else, either, which is nice. I’m in control of everything on that instance.

    As for Lemmy, I just started my own instance today, and am currently writing you from it. What made me decide to setup my own instance was some performance issues I was seeing with Lemmy.world, although that might have been an UI problem. Anyway, I enjoy doing this stuff, so I’m running my own instance for the sake of doing it.

    On the flip side, it’s more expensive and time consuming, and I’m the one who has to worry about backing up data, etc. Like I said, though, I enjoy doing it, so it’s no big deal.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can you tell me a bit about the process you went through to create your own instance? I’d like to make one myself.

      • Matt@netmonkey.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re talking about Lemmy, right?

        I provisioned an Ubuntu 22.02 server at Linode. I chose their 2 GB Shared CPU instance type. Once I configured the server to my liking, I ran through the Lemmy-Ansible instructions. (They have other methods, so check the documentation.)

        Essentially, you install Ansible on your workstation. I’m on macOS and installed it via Homebrew. You then download their git repository, create the necessary configuration files, and then have Ansible configure the server. It was fairly simple.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I may go that route. I was wanting to host my own server but I feel like it would be easier to just use a cloud server

          • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I have a lab at home and do host some stuff for myself from there in a small DMZ (ie: Miniflux RSS readers, Plex through Reverse proxy etc).

            But I used a linode for my lemmy/kbin stuff. Reason being is that the code is fairly new and there may be exploits bugs and

            1. I dont want to deal with my ISP made an instance is exploited and becomes some type of C2 box or spews out spam. Kbin specifically already has PRs to fix XSS and Sql injection stuff, the former of which is usually avoidable if you just follow some pretty basic principles. So its a concern.

            2. Linode has better bandwidth than my non-symmetrical ISP uplink and is on its own quota.

            • JCreazy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              It sounds like linode is the way to go then and their prices seem reasonable. The funny thing is I’ve heard of linode before because Computer Clan uses it as a sponsor, but ever since I started using sponsor block I haven’t really heard about it. I didn’t actually know what they did.

              • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’ve run linodes for years. My blog runs on them. I still host a variety of other services on them. They are good for everything from gaming servers to a blog etc.

                They did get bought out by akamai a while back. And have raised their prices but they are still solid.

                Nanodes are awesome deals frankly.

                • JCreazy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Is the 2GB the one you use for your Lemmy server? I’m getting ready to purchase one to see if I can figure it out.

    • drlecompte@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I run my own Mastodon instance, but for Lemmy it seemed more logical to join an existing instance that aligned with my interests. I wouldn’t be adverse to abandoning my self-hosted Mastodon for a shared instance, but I would prefer a small instance run by and for people I know, rather than one of the huge ones.

      • Matt@netmonkey.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What might make you want to ditch your self-hosted Mastodon instance?

        With Lemmy, I didn’t feel a need to pick any specific instance because I can follow communities from anywhere, and it seems to work pretty well.

        One downside I’ve encountered with my own Lemmy instance is that post and comment history in the communities I follow begins when I started following them on my new instance. New posts and comments are federated my way, going forward, but I don’t have the ability to go back and view as much history as one would on lemmy.world or lemmy.ml, for example.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      As someone who likes having control over their data and especially backups, and someone who normally enjoys self-hosting things, I honestly might do it. I’m not sure if I’d want to host a lemmy instance or kbin instance though, since I know they all federate together anyway. I may also end up waiting until the software is more mature too before looking into it.

      • Matt@netmonkey.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s awesome! Running my own social media instances has become a hobby for me.

        Having my own Lemmy instance has felt fairly seamless versus using Lemmy.world, but there have been some kinks. For example, when attempting to subscribe to a new community, the server has to pull a bunch of data first. This takes several seconds, but the UI simply says “not found” – and then after several seconds, the UI updates with the community you want to follow. I figured this out by tailing the logs.

        Also, the installation was pretty damn easy, especially when compared to Mastodon.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I’d maybe be interested in trying out self-hosting Mastodon at some point too, good to hear that Lemmy was easy to install though. I’m not too worried since I have quite a bit of Linux experience, I figure it probably won’t be too bad to setup whatever social media instances I’m interested in checking out.

          • Matt@netmonkey.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, if you’ve got a decent amount of Linux experience, I don’t think you’ll have any issues. Mastodon’s installation is well-documented and works. My only criticism is that it’s a bit long and you have to be careful not to miss anything.

            On the other hand, I recall installing Pixelfed back several months ago and having a difficult time. The documentation was lacking, and it required me to use Arch Linux, which I had never used. I was able to get it working, but eventually terminated the instance after a while because I was never using it.

            • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Oof, yeah, requiring someone to use Arch definitely seems like a steep requirement lol